Our financial evaluation of investments in a sustainable future are complex, as you can see below in the context of building out smart and microgrids. We see money is running out from the 2009 Recovery Act, in terms of upgrading our grids, so we are faced with a decision to extend from there or pull back and stop modernizing.
What would be your choice? Can we afford not to move away from centralized power with failed transmission lines and facilities? Will global warming put us in harm's way of more storms and more costly outages?
We believe the better ROI is to invest in this available technology, to build redundancy in our power-supply systems, and to better manage energy and cuts loss and waste. Do you agree?
Here's the balance of the story:
- Require federal mission critical facilities to use clean energy technologies.
- Require direct use of on-site clean energy technologies in reconstruction of critical public buildings.
- Develop federal-state partnerships to fund installations and facilitate joint procurement.
- Investigate local opportunities to use on-site clean energy technologies at emergency shelters, first responder stations, and on other critical infrastructure sites.
- Legislatures could require installation of on-site clean energy technologies at state mission critical facilities.
- Create state incentives to support use of clean energy technologies at public facilities.
- Establish incentives for the private sector to install new on-site clean energy protection at hospitals and university laboratories.
0 comments:
Post a Comment